---
--
CC: 1092011IC3SSAG
--
I don't have the know-how to create webpages like Sharon so this isn't going to be beautiful but the injustice against Sharon is about as wrong and ugly as it can get. Therefore the lack of beauty is fitting. I am sure Sharon will make this more presentable though.

Investigating her case has become and has been one of my top priorities because when I looked closer at all that is involved it became very clear to me she is the victim of several crimes including having her privacy invaded by the use and means of her computer and her phone. The person violating her right to privacy was then able to obtain support of others against her. What resulted was Sharon became also a victim of mobbing, bullying by a group of people.

There's a lot of ground to cover. Therefore this will be equated to the likeness of a book because of the amount of information I will be providing. I will prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that she has been victimised over and over again and that this banning done by Henrik Hedda Wallin is clearly and concisely a defamation of Sharon's character, an atrocity and a case of pure character assassination, done so willfully, methodically, and precisely by his hand with the intent to cause Sharon excessive duress and personal harm. In addition I will also provide data showing how and why Mr. Wallin became and has been for quite some time, a person of interest involving privacy invasion through the use of electronic equipment such as computers and telephones and therefore why it also became in his best interest to ruin Sharon's (Artsieladie's) creditability using others to help him to accomplish this.

May the -person of interest- accessing Sharon's computer enjoy their intrusion because it has become the -main place of operation- because there is no better place of operation than at the -scene of the crime(s)-. Please, play with me!

-Hans

Where to start. There is so much to cover the start becomes irrelevant.
--
About this on the [Death Poetry Competition@wiki] wiki: (http://www.elftown.com/wiki.html?name=Death%20Poetry%20Competition)

>"2011-09-11: Again . . . given the circumstances of the badge-maker's banning, the very picky "PUBLIC NOTICE!" on her house's presentation, and the questionable copyright status of the source material used for her photomanips, it might be logical to get someone else to provide the badge artwork and other related art. For all of the above reasons I refuse to post her badge art on my house's presenation though I have mentioned I won the first installment of this competition."

Particularly:

>"...the questionable copyright status of the source material used for her photomanips..."

Sharon's art being referred to is not photo manipulation. There is NO questionable copyright status because it is her work. Slandering someone when they can't even defend themselves is not something that should be allowed, especially since she is being accused of the same, trying to get to the bottom of what she has been subjected to for 4 years, but she is banned for 'this' supposedly. Apparently it is okay for others to do this to her, but she is not allowed to defend herself.

About the "Public Notice":
As long as any work is hers no matter what work it is, she has FULL rights and has the FULL say as to how or if it may be used. No one else has ANY say. If her creative works get destroyed or defamed in any way, the person responsible is liable and since Hedda is the owner of this site, he will be held accountable for this. Since I am a native of the same country, I will see to it that he is.

From https://sites.google.com/a/elftown.org/www/calls_to_myself

Sharon gave a full explanation about her art referred to above:

The art referred to:

http://www.elftown.com/stuff/DeathPoetryCompetition-2011_500w.png

--
http://www.elftown.com/stuff/DeathPoetryBadge-Winner-2011.png - http://www.elftown.com/stuff/DeathPoetryBadge-Participant-2011.png

Statement by Sharon:
Just what is questionable about these "3" art pieces? They are NOT photo-manipulations, either!

The top image was created in Photoshop. The gravestone was made with the "shapes" tool; one shape a 'rectangle' and the other the 'ellipse' tool. The two shapes were then merged together to form the gravestone. Next I decided on the colour using "hue-saturation" and then I applied the "light marble" pattern, using the "fill tool" with the layer's pixels locked. I made adjustments to my liking, using the "burn" and "dodge" tools. To create the depth (3D), I duplicated the gravestone layer and made whatever adjustments to the 'bottom duplicate' to give the appearance of depth. The lettering was done by using the "type" tool.

As for the rest in this piece... The shrubbery: created from "my" digitally created, basic tree shape. The foliage is created with the brush tool, five different layers, each a different colour green and then merged together. The grass: made with the "grass brush" tool, specifically. The flowers at the bases of and in front of the rear gravestones: are made with the brush tool, several layers, each layer a different colour then merged together. The dandelions: were made from scanning in "real dandelions". The bumblebee: was created digitally by yours truly. The two Geraniums: are also my art, originally made using pencil and coloured pencil, drawn by looking at a "real" geranium and I then edited it in Photoshop.

The book image was created by using the "shapes" tool, starting out with the 'rectangle' shape to create one half of the book cover. Using the "transform" tool for adjusting perspective, the half was then made. Once the one half layer was made, it was then duplicated. Using the "transform" tool again, the layer was then mirrored (flipped horizontally over an imaginary vertical line) and then moved alongside of the first half to make the 'whole' book cover.

The first page created was created similarly, but some was erased and some was added using the "brush" and "eraser" tools and the 'perspective' option with the "transform" tool until the shape of the page was how I wanted it. This was then the "half" of the what would become the "facing page(s)". It then was duplicated and flipped to make the second half of facing page(s) like I had done with the book cover layers. The two 'page layers' were then merged together to make the appearance of an open book (two facing pages together).

To make the 'page border'... This 'facing pages' layer was then duplicated 'twice', each layer made into two different colours. The top layer of was then made a little smaller, so the layer beneath would make it appear as though there was a border around the page. These two layers were then merged; what was to represent the 'facing pages' area was then "cut" by using the 'wand' tool to select the facing pages' colour while retaining the colour representing the 'border' colour. This is how the border started. Then I changed the border's colour to a colour that I use to begin my "gold metallic effect". My gold metallic effect is an effect "I" developed and the 'how to' of I do not share.

To make 'multiple (facing) pages'... First I duplicated the gold border layer and the facing pages' layer and then merged the duplicates. Each of these 'merged duplicates' were then duplicated and made just a little smaller using the "transforming" tool. I repeated this several times, making each layer just a little smaller each time to give the appearance of the correct perspective of a book opened to its middle, displaying an equal number of pages on both halves or sides, until I was satisfied with the number of pages.

The 'binding' appearance was made by making additional layers and shaped to my satisfaction.

To make variations of the book image, I hit "select all", "copy merged" and then pasted into a new canvas area and changed the colours of by using the "hue/saturation" tool. To make a book with little colour, I used the "desaturation" option in the "hue/saturation" window.

The badge shape I re-made using a combination of a Photoshop shape and the shape of the Elftown badge, because the badge shape that's used on Elftown is cockeyed. I split it into several layers, making two backgrounds, one (the top) a little smaller for the same purpose as explained above for creating a border and both for the top part and the bottom part (the base) and the base has two parts. As I also explained previously, I then created the 'gold metallic effect" borders for all the parts. The background areas of the top part is the result of using the fill with pattern tool as is the rear part of the badge base. The fore part of the base I opted to make a solid colour so it wouldn't rival with the lettering added to it. The additional gold balls and the centered star are also made with my 'gold metallic effect', as is the lettering and the fancy scrolly thingy on the top part of the badge near the bottom. The items added to the badge I've previously explained how they were made: the gravestone and the book. The feather was a "real feather" scanned into Photoshop. The background from scanned in feather was erased and using Photoshop tools, I made various adjustments to my liking. The diamond(s) is from a Paint Shop Pro Picture Tube, that "came with" the PSP program.

My suggestion to the person making accusations against my art: First, get your facts straight. Second, if you don't know how to work digitally, then don't make statements based on assumptions stemming from your own personal grudge you have against the creator and when you have no idea what you are talking about. As can be CLEARLY seen through my explaining of the process and procedures I used, the work you have suggested to be of "questionable copyright status and source material" and done by "photo-manipulation" are ERRONEOUSLY stated.

About my "PUBLIC NOTICE": As for my "very picky" public notice, I would hope that ALL artists of any genre, using any medium, would be "very picky" in regards to their work, how it's used, if it's used, etc.. Due to the many opportunistic thieves of others' works, all artists need to and should protect their work by every possible means they can. Again, another foolhardy statement based on apparent ignorance, preempted by a personal grudge.

Only a person who actually did the work would be able to provide the details of their work which she has abundantly provided here.

About this: [Calls_To_Myself@wiki] (http://www.elftown.com/wiki.html?name=Calls_To_Myself)

A person only covers up something when they have something to hide. The page was fully open to the world for months ever since it was created on 03-02-2011 but suddenly on 08-29-2011 Hedda HAD TO password it? I suppose since it is he whom is the -subject of interest- having to do with the contents, which he -claims- to know nothing about, one might be compelled to try to cover up their tracks just like deleting my email account at MSN which was set up deliberately. The only person who stood to gain with it gone was Hedda because it had an incriminating email in it addressed to me from him.

From [For The L♥ve Of A Community - Elftown!@wiki] (http://www.elftown.com/wiki.html?name=For%20The%20L%e2%99%a5ve%20Of%20A%20Community%20-%20Elftown%21)

My comment:
2011-05-06 [Sir_Hans]: I am one of the witnesses of the heart being placed in Sharon's badge slot. It was NOT done by SilverFire. It was done by Hedda, as it was also he who removed it as well. There are witnesses and screen captures but there is also irrefutable evidence with a technology not yet available to the general public which Hedda doesn't have knowledge of and therefore does not know how to counter play it.

Interesting - [Elftron]: "Was last seen 866 days ago. (Logged out)" This information was added to this presentation (although while logged out) about the same time as the news article was placed referring to: "Upgraded to Roxen Webserver 5.1.185 (with Pike 7.8.534) 2011-04-18." The news article: Date: 2011-04-18 01:20:52 News #: 590 Reporter: Hedda

[True, plain and simple] wrote in Sharon's guestbook: ""He must have also rigged it so that you never went to the invite page to invite Hans too, right? Because the screenshots showed that as well."

Sharon was said to be the liar. I guess Hedda "did" rig the invite page after all. It has been proven she did invite me. Who's the liar? Who rigged what? Fooling True, plain and simple is mighty clever! If Hedda can fool him, it would be reasonable to assume Hedda can also fool just about anyone else here on this site.

The cat must have everyone's tongue around here. The Calls_To_Myself page and its affiliated links clearly and directly point towards and placing Hedda under undeniable suspicion, but no one here has anything to say now? -noted-

-Hans

--
Hedda's replying comment: (Please take notice of him stating he knows nothing about the "other shit" I have mentioned.)
2011-05-06 [Hedda]: How the fuck is it "interesting" that I updated [Elftron]'s presentation without logging in as that user?

Please, go away! I have no idea what the other shit is about and I seriously don't give a crap. It doesn't matter what I write, because you're just going to waste more of my time.
--
The content he is covering up can be seen and read here:
https://sites.google.com/a/elftown.org/www/calls_to_myself

The comments on the page can be read here:
https://sites.google.com/a/elftown.org/love/calls_to_myself/comments

Please take notice how the -contents of the page- are NEVER discussed on the page, even though Sharon suggests to on more than one occasion. Deliberate avoidance? Hedda is CLEARLY shown to being involved with the content, the -person of interest- but nothing is said about it?

About this:


https://sites.google.com/a/elftown.org/love/_/rsrc/1315944928510/Mainstreet/BanningBannerDefilingMyNameOnMyET-House-n-AcrossTheNet2011-09-13.png

>"Banned for never ever stop spreading conspiracy theories, slander other Elftowners and basically flood new members with lies about Elftown and refusing to leave a lot of the old members alone, while spreading lies behind their back about it."

If a person is being subjected to something, in Sharon's case it has been stalking, privacy invasion and then railroaded and roadblocked when she attempted to try to figure it out, tried to get answers and was trying to understand herself what was happening to her, it's no wonder if she came up with theories when trying to make sense of everything. Even law enforcement personnel come up with -theories- based on what has been either obtained or provided to them. As more evidence comes in, it is then added into the -theorising process- which then some is ruled out and some kept as additional pieces to the overall -theorising process-. If she had had some help or any real willingness to help her figure it out, she may not have had to -theorise- all on her own. It's easy for others on the outside looking in to make judgment calls, but being caught up in a situation is quite different.

If people in position had provided her with the information or at least had been willing to hear her out in what she was trying to say but didn't quite know how since her suspicions evolved around the owner of this site, she wouldn't have had to theorise. If anyone in position to help on the site had really wanted to help her they would have. Instead they -laughed at her and poked fun of her-. She was accused of not showing any evidence. When she did, Hedda then threatened her saying he would permanently ban her which is equivalent to permanently -slandering- her and her artistry across the internet, defaming her character, if she told -her- side of the story.

Even so the responsibility does not lie so much on their shoulders because the person who has been totally evasive is Hedda himself. She went to him first. His response was to play games with her head with roses and images. Another time he accused her of spreading lies around that he had placed viruses on her computer. Sharon did not say any such thing. She had gotten a Trojan warning from Kaspersky when she clicked on an Elftown email link that took her to Mainstreet which she explained to him in full detail and with backup proof of everything she said and did. He was wrong but did he apologise and tell Sharon that -he- had made a mistake or that -he- had contrived a mistaken -conspiracy theory- of his own? Wasn't -he- also then guilty of exactly the same as what he is banning -her- for?

Another time Hedda told Sharon if she didn't understand something to ask him and she did. Did he answer her questions? No he insulted her instead throwing her daughter in her face as part of it. He accused her of chasing people away from one of his other sites for children including the former moderator. He also stated all the council members there, past and present, had begged him to get rid of Sharon. Sharon asked several of these people including the former mod Lerune and all those she asked said what Hedda said was NOT true. So just who is -spreading lies about other Elftowners-? Is this a case of the pot calling the kettle black? I do believe so.

Just who are all these -new- members Sharon has supposedly -flooded with- lies about Elftown? Refusing to leave a lot of -old members- alone? Just whom are these -old- members? Old in age or old in membership? A lot? How many? Who all exactly? If old in membership, Sharon did try to break the ice with -leaving name out at her request- but she took it to mean something else must be according to her statement on [For The L♥ve Of A Community - Elftown!@wiki]. She also states: "2011-05-08: Or getting that Hans guy to send me crap, as recent as last week. You visit my wiki’s and write fake friendly comments, or follow me around on other wiki’s. I consider that harassment and have and will keep reporting it."
-----------
Sharon -gets me to send her crap-? Sharon doesn't get me to do anything. Just who is -conspiring a theory- now? As recent as last week? Her comment: 2011-05-08 My last anything to her when I was inquiring from Sharon's guestbook: GB#1129102 From: Sir_Hans Sent: 2011-01-22 03:45:51 (258 days ago) Long week, wouldn't anyone agree? Roughly 3 1/2 months?

Sharon didn't go to any wikis with the intent to harass her, Sharon WAS trying to see if she could break the ice with her. Sharon isn't a fake in any way but I guess she had a -conspiracy theory- going on of her own about Sharon then?

I wonder if what Sharon did could compare to these comments placed on Sharon's private wiki while she was having a private conversation with another member on her private wiki:
(Against-Artsieladie-Harassing-Comments-1st-SG)
http://www.elftown.com/stuff/1stComByDebbie_del_2008-10-06.png

Sharon tried to ignore it and thought if she got rid of it, the intruder would take the hint and leave, but this wasn't the case:

(Against-Artsieladie-Harassing-Comments-2nd-SG)
http://www.elftown.com/stuff/2ndComByDebbie-wSilvCom_del_2008-10-13.png

Again she deleted the harassing comments by both a then vice mayor and guard:
(Against-Artsieladie-Harassing-Comments-3rd-SG)
http://www.elftown.com/stuff/3rdComByDebbie-wSilvCom_del_2008-10-13.png

Yet again:
(Against-Artsieladie-Harassing-Comments-4th-SG)
http://www.elftown.com/stuff/4thComByDebbie-wSilvComIn_del_2008-10-13.png

Yet again:
(Against-Artsieladie-Harassing-Comments-5th-SG)
http://www.elftown.com/stuff/5thComByDebbie-wScCapsIn_del_2008-10-13.png

Repeating from above:
>"I consider that harassment and have and will keep reporting it."

She isn't guilty of harassment and her then guard friend as well? Sharon didn't report it because she knew it was pointless to considering whom the harassers were. Hedda was also watching the page at the time and said nothing. Funny, how Sharon's faults are always pointed out but others' faults aren't? It must depend on -who- you are around Elftown.com. I think most would agree that both of these members were deliberately trying to provoke Sharon but this doesn't get exposed for the public to see because it's all about Sharon getting blamed for everything while others are totally blameless?

There has been nothing said behind Sharon's back? It's been said behind her back that she is a psychobitch 3, drama queen, she's delusional, and much more but as long as its said behind Sharon's back it's okay? Several others have had their say about other members on Elftown.com in conversations with Sharon too including the person who is crying foul the loudest. Wouldn't this also make these people just as guilty then?

The point in case here is Sharon is being accused and banned because of all these accusations but the real fact of the matter is -she- is not alone in making mistakes. She has been beside herself trying to get to the bottom of something she has been subjected to for 4 years. What are the excuses of the others? There are others on the site who are as guilty, starting at the top. Yet Sharon is being singled out and used as a scapegoat to bear the brunt of everyone's, including the owner's indiscretions? It appears there is more than enough blame to be shared by all involved not only Sharon. This isn't supposed to get out though to the rest of the members on the site. The guilty finger must only be pointed at Sharon, no one else though they are guilty as well.

Sharon has also offered a number of times to have everyone involved get together and put on the table everything to discuss the issues to see where mistakes and misgivings were made by all involved. Is anyone interested in trying this? It doesn't appear so. If others are so blameless wouldn't it make sense they would want to try it at least? It would involve others having to admit their mistakes and misgivings along with Sharon however.

Some more about the reference made in regards to "old" members, -theorising- this means "long standing members":
Not long before this banning statement was posted, Sharon did correspond with 2 "old" members. They both became agitated when Sharon reminded the both of them about their -less than complimentary remarks and statements- about other Elftown members, namely council members that they had made. They each then became less than pleasant with her and instructed her not to be in contact with them again. Sharon did NOT correspond with them ANY further but instead simply blocked the both of them on the site. One of these "old" members called Sharon: " a mother fucking lunatic" but this is perfectly alright since it was Sharon who was receiving such treatment.

Let's get to some more -theories-.

The last comment on Sharon's -private wikipage- [For The L♥ve Of A Community - Elftown!@wiki] (http://www.elftown.com/wiki.html?name=For%20The%20L%e2%99%a5ve%20Of%20A%20Community%20-%20Elftown%21)

The comment in its entirety:

>"2011-05-08: Hedda pitted us against each other? Seriously. It seems to me that all the accusations you are expressing towards Hedda now, were at first in fact all expressed towards me.

I was the one who put you on the Council. At some point it seemed to me you had trouble communicating with him. On one hand his bluntness seemed to offend you, on the other hand you seemed to try and please him too much (in my opinion). So I tried to help you, which I have done for others too. I wish someone had done that for me when I became crew, so I wouldn't have been in so many arguments for taking things far too seriously.
Instead you were offended, because you felt I was saying that because I tried to keep you away from him. You became defensive saying it was your choice to want to please him or not. I never disagreed with that, but to me it came across as if you were doing it because you were in love with him rather than you actually liking the ideas. Generally it's not very constructive if someone just agrees to everything out of pure admiration (or fear), so that would be something I'd want to prevent.

At some point I told you he can read private messages, which every site owner actually can. I told you he probably was reading messages, because I knew for a fact he has sometimes read mine. But personally I didn't care about that, you however made it out as if he was constantly reading everything you were writing. Which is not what I had said.

Then we had an msn-conversation, which was after midnight for me. I was tired, I apparently wrote crappy English sounding like Hedda. I had a webcam though, you could've easily checked if it was actually me.

After that a friend sent me a link that I was stupid enough to click. It turned out to be a virus and it was sent to all my online friends. I had to shut off my msn, as to not have it keep sending it to everyone. I deleted msn from my computer and reinstalled the program. Since that took me some time, it took a while for me to get back online to warn the online friends not to click that stupid link.
Funnily, you are the only one who sought something behind it. You started telling everyone I had tried to infect your computer with a virus on purpose. And a lot of people believed you, at that point I became the bitch of Elftown. Thanks for that BTW.

By now you have changed your story and tell everyone that a 'third' person was in that conversation. And you won't believe me anyway, just like you don't believe Silverfire. It’s funny how you and Hans were “witness” to this heart being placed by Hedda, when neither of you can actually know who was doing the editing. You could only see the heart being there and the heart being gone at a certain point in time. Plus, True actually proved it wasn’t Hedda.
Other people don't log everything in journals and screenshots, so details get lost. Especially when it's about something they didn't actually think about as being important, because it simply wasn't important. If we could have all foreseen this shit happening, we would have made different choices beforehand.

Anyhoo. After that you actually went behind my back asking around about me. Somehow you concocted the theory that Hedda and I were romantically involved in some way. Most of my arguments with Hedda took place on MSN, so on Elftown we'd more often already agree on things. Apparently this lead for more people to believe that I fancied him and was trying to lick his ass or something. But you and they couldn't have been more wrong. I think there haven't been many on crew he has had more arguments about Elftown with than me.
Furthermore I have never been involved with him, I actually had a boyfriend during the time of your accusations. Somehow I was however made out to be a scorned woman, rejected by Hedda and jealous of you. And Hedda was trying to keep us apart, to prevent me from telling you what he did. He did NOTHING to me. We are still friends, the only bad thing he did was to not protect me from your crazy accusations. He has shown me things you have written, because they involved me and showed how you were trying to make me look bad towards him and pretty much everyone else I know on here.
It are these stupid accusations that got me to turn against you, you did that all by yourself. Why should I like someone who's saying all these things about me?

As for ideas being ripped apart and then used anyway, this isn’t new. It’s also not new that Hedda would say something, and then not back the person up later. People can change their minds and Hedda isn’t tactical to begin with nor reads all that people write (so he could’ve not cared about something or missed postings he should’ve seen). So you're not special in that respect, it has happened to all of us at some point in time.

When talking about tooting your horn, you aren't the only one who hasn't always been recognised for his or her work. It would often take a while, but you were the only one who at some point started to gripe about it. All the time. And since people generally don't like that, it might have caused for you to not get the things you wanted as fast as you wanted them. Other crewmembers don’t “arrange” for awards being given to them, they don’t have a say in that. I think most of the gripe was about the beaver badge, this badge is however one of the hardest to give out because there aren’t really any rules for it. After I became council it took 2 years for me to get the top beaver badge, it took you 2,5 years. That’s not a very big difference. Especially not when taking into account that I also got it for my guardwork, not just for all the wiki’s I made and organised.
I think it's obvious why for instance you weren't promoted to Guard, there were simply way too many problems in working together with you. There were already enough things to do, they didn't need arguments on top of that.

At first people didn’t see you for what you were. They thought I was exaggerating and should just ignore it. But after I resigned, the accusations started to shift towards other female crewmembers such as Silverfire and Lothuriel (suddenly they were in love with Hedda too). This was very interesting and opened a lot of peoples’ eyes. Somehow you rarely seemed to have issues with male members. Granted there weren’t a lot of male crew in comparison to female crew, but they were present and they’d also speak up in reply to your accusations.

It’s been more than three years since I resigned and this shit is still going on. You even managed to chase off one of my best friends on here, being True. You have been telling people you’d spill the beans on Hedda for ages, long before I resigned. You keep resurrecting wiki’s about it, writing diaries about it, even sending me messages and guestbooks about it. Or getting that Hans guy to send me crap, as recent as last week. You visit my wiki’s and write fake friendly comments, or follow me around on other wiki’s. I consider that harassment and have and will keep reporting it.
I don’t care if you like Hedda, if there are beans to spill and you think everyone should know then spill them already. Please set us all free. Or keep us out of it, if you only want Hedda to explain it to you.

All this time I could’ve posted copies of our messages, as to disprove things you were saying about me. But I didn’t, because that would’ve been the attention you were looking for and it would've been pointless as you rarely actually listen.
Since this crap is still continuing I felt I should give my 2 cents. I however want you to leave me out of this, stop mentioning me or referring to me in some way. It should be clear by now that I want nothing to do with you, Hans, your family, your crap or whatever. I advised for Hedda to ban you 3-4 years ago and I still do. If you keep this up I will continue to do so. He seems to be able to tolerate you, but that might end at some point.

>"I was the one who put you on the Council." - Why? In fact why did she even ask Sharon for a -relation-? Farther down below in my article here, a reader will see why I ask these questions now.

>"At some point it seemed to me you had trouble communicating with him. On one hand his bluntness seemed to offend you, on the other hand you seemed to try and please him too much (in my opinion)."

Seemed and (in her opinion) are mentioned here how many times? It seems she is making her -own assumptions-, theorising. The point is we all do this. We all form our own opinions and -theorise- based on what we are presented with. Sharon is no different but if Sharon does this, she is criticised for doing so.

>"So I tried to help you, which I have done for others too. I wish someone had done that for me when I became crew, so I wouldn't have been in so many arguments for taking things far too seriously."

But if Hedda had answered Sharon's inquiry letter on 01-07-2008 as to what his agenda really was, Sharon wouldn't have had to go to her in the first place. Who's fault is it then that Sharon felt a need to go to her?

Referring to an MSN conversation because she suggested to Sharon they take their conversations from Elftown to MSN:
>"Instead you were offended, because you felt I was saying that because I tried to keep you away from him. You became defensive saying it was your choice to want to please him or not. I never disagreed with that, but to me it came across as if you were doing it because you were in love with him rather than you actually liking the ideas. Generally it's not very constructive if someone just agrees to everything out of pure admiration (or fear), so that would be something I'd want to prevent."

"Instead you were offended... because you felt... you became defensive" This is yet again her assumption, her theory, her opinion and not a problem because we all do this.

Basic contents of the MSN conversation being referred to:
Sharon was told that: Hedda and her weren't and wouldn't be good or work well together; she shouldn't try to please Hedda all the time; she shouldn't agree with him all the time; that perhaps she should just walk away from the ECM project for she had and even told Hedda to shove it up his ass; Hedda was only interested in something when it benefited him, a generalised summary.

After all these statements were made however, according to her: "Then we had an msn-conversation, which was after midnight for me. I was tired, I apparently wrote crappy English sounding like Hedda." First, she and Sharon were -already in- an MSN conversation and it wasn't only crappy English as she says but it was contradictory to what she had previously stated. For a person being tired, the blast of text was rather strong and she basically was getting on Sharon's case about disagreeing with what Hedda had written in his diary about members choosing to be -nameless pieces of meat- by not providing more information about themselves. Sharon did NOT agree with Hedda on the issue but first she was accused of always agreeing with him and then she was for all practical purposes questioned for -disagreeing with Hedda-.

Since it can't be both ways which did she mean then? How was Sharon supposed to know just what she was getting at? Sharon even said in the conversation to her that she didn't -seem to be- herself. Sharon was confused and she thought she had done or said something that had rubbed her the wrong way.

The next issue that appeared was a statement as far as Sharon knew came in to her from -leaving name out at her request- person about some HAHA.exe to click on. Since it showed to be from her what else was Sharon to think at the time? They had just ended a conversation not long before which Sharon was still confused about as well thinking she had offended her in some way.

Sharon wasn't an avid user of MSN messenger at the time and she still doesn't use it all that much and she does not use a webcam. She did not know what to think about it all combined together, the previous contradictory conversation and then the HAHA. So she went to another person who she thought to be a friend at the time thinking she could help to make sense of it all. The friend suggested Sharon take it to Hedda. Sharon thinking her friend knew the both much better than she herself did, she followed her suggestion. As a result Hedda basically let Sharon have it with both barrels making the entire situation that much worse.

At some point however Sharon was able to connect some dots that -seemed- to her to make sense and she then told -leaving name out at her request- that she no longer thought she had sent the HAHA, but has this tidbit of information been shared? Since there isn't ever any mention of it, I probably can -assume- it has -not- been shared.

>"...but to me it came across as if you were doing it because you were in love with him rather than you actually liking the ideas."

It -came across to her- that Sharon was in love with Hedda and this is why Sharon was agreeing with Hedda? No, Sharon was not in love with Hedda. She respected him. She wanted to be a part of trying to make the site better but she was NOT in love with Hedda. Sharon agrees when she agrees and she disagrees when she disagrees. There are instances when she did not agree with Hedda and there are instances when she did. Even if she was in love with Hedda as this person -theorised- she was, Sharon would have still not agreed with him -all- the time.

Since she herself had in the above mentioned conversation told Sharon or got on her case over -not- agreeing with Hedda's idea of person giving out more information about themselves out, she is contradicting herself yet again. About the prevention part, this is understandable.

>"By now you have changed your story and tell everyone that a 'third' person was in that conversation. And you won't believe me anyway, just like you don't believe Silverfire. It’s funny how you and Hans were “witness” to this heart being placed by Hedda, when neither of you can actually know who was doing the editing. You could only see the heart being there and the heart being gone at a certain point in time. Plus, True actually proved it wasn’t Hedda.

>Other people don't log everything in journals and screenshots, so details get lost. Especially when it's about something they didn't actually think about as being important, because it simply wasn't important. If we could have all foreseen this shit happening, we would have made different choices beforehand."

Theories do change as new information becomes available. Since Sharon had no other choice than to investigate on her own and had no real help finding viable answers, it doesn't surprise me at all her theories changed. The amount of stonewalling and circumvention she was handed didn't help. Therefore it is unfair to be accusatory and judgmental. If her theories had not changed as she acquired new information, she wouldn't have been doing the task of investigation properly. Any investigation remains subject to change until -all- the evidence is in. Since being an investigator fits my job description I do know what I am talking about.

"Other people not being subjected to anything do not log everything into journals and screenshots, so details get lost." Normally people do not log everything they possibly can -unless they have good reason or cause to do so-. Sharon didn't before all the suspicious activity began happening with her either. She was like others, simply enjoying her time on the site and on her computer. At some point this all began to change at the end of 2007 and the very beginning of 2008 and the strange, unexplainable occurrences began on Elftown.com and as time went on, more things began to happen other places she belonged to on the Internet, with her computer, with her phone.

Any level headed person when having many unexplainable situations happen would at some point think to begin keeping track of these oddities. So Sharon began to in ways she could save whatever she could. This is completely logical and the intelligent action to take. Since like most people she is at her computer alone most of the time, therefore with no witnesses at her disposal at any given time, the only option she had was to log and document the information with the aid of screengrabs and page sources as backup proof. As time went on, she began to notice a person was becoming the -connecting link- between these odd instances and this person. The -person of interest- is Hedda.

I would like to know also since some people on Elftown.com -seem to assume- they're experts and say Sharon was ridiculous for collecting data as she did, how would any of these people have proceeded to find out what was going on? What would these people have done to obtain answers? Before criticising another's plan of action, it might not be a bad idea to at least offer an alternative plan of action while doing so? I haven't heard of any better plan of action she should have taken.

>"Especially when it's about something they didn't actually think about as being important, because it simply wasn't important."

Naturally what was happening with Sharon wasn't important -because it wasn't something that was happening to anyone else-. If this had been the case of others also going through the same or similar, it -would have been- important. But because it was something that was seemingly only affecting Sharon, it was NOT important. When something is not important, others unaffected do not want to hear about it or bother themselves with it, until or if it actually happens to them. Then it becomes important.

>"If we could have all foreseen this shit happening, we would have made different choices beforehand."

If Sharon could have foreseen having her privacy and her life invaded, I'm positive she would have definitely made different and better choices beforehand. Unfortunately though foresight is never quite as good as hindsight.

>"...tell everyone that a 'third' person was in that conversation"
If there was not a third person in that conversation, then the person Sharon was speaking with is very good at -changing her persona- because it is not only that the English is crappy, there's incoherency but more importantly the unmistakable contradiction involved. So the person talking to Sharon -was- the -same person-? She likes to contradict herself then. -Noted-

>"And you won't believe me anyway, just like you don't believe Silverfire."

With good reason? Since it is a bit difficult to swallow something said by a -contradictory person-, what would really be expected here?

>"It’s funny how you and Hans were “witness” to this heart being placed by Hedda, when neither of you can actually know who was doing the editing. You could only see the heart being there and the heart being gone at a certain point in time. Plus, True actually proved it wasn’t Hedda."

This coming from a person who can't even figure out how the -interesting people feature- works or the -invite feature-? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see when there is "a" guestbook message. Then to go to one's house and see an -additional- heart that wasn't there JUST MINUTES PRIOR TO and also a new badge. Then to go to the guestbook where there is still only ONE -new- message and it is from Hedda delivering the -new- badge. The -additional heart- was placed just to the left of the Inspector link, indicative of and related to the -new- Inspector's badge. Both Sharon's and my memory are clear and yet after all the time that has passed because she and I had a little tiff over it. I acted childishly and jealously about it, saying that the heart from Hedda meant more to her than my card and flowers I had given to her for Valentine's Day.

SilverFire on the other hand has NOT been consistent with her many attempts at explaining -how- she came about placing it in there instead of Hedda. The -only- way she could have been the one to place it in the badge box is if she -was logged in as Hedda- at that particular time.

>"Plus, True actually proved it wasn’t Hedda."

True did, did he? True -also had proof- that Sharon did not invite me to Elftown! He also accused her of lying about it and said (from guestbook #1092481):

>"And for the record, my screenshots showed that things you said occurred didn't ever fucking happen. Hedda didn't go to your wiki pretending to be someone else, and the only IP that accessed that house was one that everyone from your family uses. But I'm sure that he managed to rig that, right? Please. He must have also rigged it so that you never went to the invite page to invite Hans too, right? Because the screenshots showed that as well."

As far as NOT inviting me -according to True's proof-?
Please everyone take a look at this image. It is a copy of the -invite email from Elftown- of when Sharon -invited me to Elftown-:

http://www.elftown.com/stuff/ArtsieInvitesHansToElftown2009-02-27.png

I am -theorising- here that True's proof is wrong? If Hedda can -apparently rig- things to fool even True, a technical expert, I think it would be a fair assumption, a -logical theory- to conclude that not only can Hedda fool True who is tech smart but then he can also fool MANY other people as well especially all those who aren't tech smart?

True also made this statement in the guestbook entry prior:
>"I don't see why you should somehow know more than me, since many of these issues involve technical knowledge that you don't have, and are making vastly incorrect assumptions about."

Apparently Hedda has more knowledge than True as well? Also one does not have to have tech knowledge necessarily to know when things aren't behaving or working as they should. An average automobile operator knows little about the -technical or mechanics- of the car they drive but if it suddenly isn't working right, the person driving will know. They probably don't know -why- it isn't but they would still know that it isn't.

A bit more about my invite:
My invitation email was sent on the 27th. I became a new member of Elftown on the 28th. Sharon was credited in her house for inviting -1 members-. I placed a comment on her Love for a Community wiki less than 2 weeks later on March 12th. As a result of my commenting, Sharon's credit of inviting -1 members- was then revoked and put back to invited -0 members-.

>"Anyhoo. After that you actually went behind my back asking around about me. Somehow you concocted the theory that Hedda and I were romantically involved in some way. Most of my arguments with Hedda took place on MSN, so on Elftown we'd more often already agree on things. Apparently this lead for more people to believe that I fancied him and was trying to lick his ass or something. But you and they couldn't have been more wrong. I think there haven't been many on crew he has had more arguments about Elftown with than me.
Furthermore I have never been involved with him, I actually had a boyfriend during the time of your accusations. Somehow I was however made out to be a scorned woman, rejected by Hedda and jealous of you. And Hedda was trying to keep us apart, to prevent me from telling you what he did. He did NOTHING to me. We are still friends, the only bad thing he did was to not protect me from your crazy accusations. He has shown me things you have written, because they involved me and showed how you were trying to make me look bad towards him and pretty much everyone else I know on here.
It are these stupid accusations that got me to turn against you, you did that all by yourself. Why should I like someone who's saying all these things about me?"

"After that you actually went behind my back asking around about me." - So anyone who makes inquiries about another person through going to others is guilty of -going behind a person's back-? Am I to believe then that this person commenting has NEVER asked another person about another person?

"Somehow you concocted the theory that Hedda and I were romantically involved in some way." - Concocted a theory is a -theory 'concocted' by the commenter-. There were other people involved who told Sharon this information. There is also proof of her actions leading one to believe there was something more than friendship going on in regards to her relationship with Hedda (which shall be provided at a later time).

"Somehow I was however made out to be a scorned woman, rejected by Hedda and jealous of you." - Reminding time: An alarm about fooling around with Hedda; was promptly taken down; followed by "Sorries" in her mood. Her -concerned response- when Sharon had placed in her mood: "Hell hath no fury like that of a woman scorned." The ONLY response Sharon received by the way. Her moods: I won't let them deify you" and the "Done did it" (right after Sharon's first time banning for doing nothing wrong, stated by Hedda, the banner).

From a conversation talking about Sharon between the commenter and a friend of the commenter's that took place in the year 2007 prior to anything surfacing, made BY the commenter in reference to Sharon: "I don't care how she is gotten rid of as long as she is" and "I don't know what Hedda sees in her anyway." I think I can safely -assume- or -theorise- here that these 2 statements sum up just what the commenter's -true- intentions were and even before anything had begun to break the surface. Apparently by her own words she had in her plans to get rid of Sharon for a long time and -before- all the other incidents took place even that she is referring to throughout her comment. In fact I would go so far as to say that -she is crying foul- not because of all the gripes she has about Sharon but because Sharon first surmised who she really was and then by the commenter's own actions (which will also be shown) she revealed her -true self and true intentions- towards Sharon. She's unhappy because Sharon became wise to whom she is and what her -real agenda- is.

"We are still friends, the only bad thing he did was to not protect me from your crazy accusations. He has shown me things you have written, because they involved me and showed how you were trying to make me look bad towards him and pretty much everyone else I know on here."

"the only bad thing he did was to not protect me from your crazy accusations" - Why would he? She did say herself that Hedda does things that are only beneficial to him.

"He has shown me things you have written,.." - Yes, I bet he has, but the real question is, just -where- did he obtain Sharon's writings from?  She's such a good friend to Hedda she is telling the world -how- she obtained her information and the -whom- that provided it. -Noted-

"It are these stupid accusations that got me to turn against you, you did that all by yourself. Why should I like someone who's saying all these things about me?" - Stupid in her -opinion-, her -theory-. Blaming Sharon saying Sharon turned -her- against Sharon. This is one for the records since it has been revealed that -she- has been determined to get rid of Sharon long before any of this bull she's spewing even took place.

"Why should I like someone who's saying all these things about me?" - I do believe Sharon has probably asked herself this same question many times, especially knowing that -she- has wanted to get rid of Sharon for a very long time.

More coming.

---